Skip navigation

Monthly Archives: April 2011

First, I will go over the CONCACAF Champion’s League final.  Simple terms, RSL missed their chances, Monterrey capitalized on theirs.  I haven’t watched replays or watched stat sheets, but it seemed that the only really good series that Monterrey got they converted into a goal.  For twenty minutes of the first half, Monterrey played well, the rest, they did what they needed to win and that’s about it.  Credit to them, and congratulations, I hope they make CONCACAF proud (even though I’ll be cheering for Man U or Barca to beat them).  Regardless, RSL left it all out on the field and for that they can be proud.  The best highlight of the match though, the stadium, sold out, with RSL fans, standing and singing all together.  This is the first time that we’ve played a Mexican side and not had it be almost an away game.  There were hardly any Monterrey fans and that was just awesome!

As for the game, Espindola really needed to put his chances at least on frame.  The open net he missed in the 11th minute, that was the difference there.  His header in the 2nd half, same, if you are going to take a header like that, with space to either volley or bring the ball down, you have to at least put it on frame.  Saborio is playing better, but I’m not sure if he’s in full form right now.   The good news is he’s getting there.  I really didn’t like Monterrey’s style after they got up a goal.  It is sad when you can characterize Mexican soccer by those traits, they get up, and then start rolling around like they got shot any time someone breathes on them.  Overall the referee did a good job of controlling that.  Overall the reffing was ok, but I think he did need to be more on top of things.  There were way too many counters where a shirt of arm tug cut the momentum on the break and nothing was called.  I think too many things were let go and not called, mostly because the ref was out of position.  I didn’t get a good look at the header by Sabo that may have gone in, but again, poor positioning (and lack of goalline technology) prevented what could have been an equalizer.  I will not blame the ref for the match, all I am saying is it could have been better.  I did thoroughly enjoy Suazo’s yellow for simulation.   The best performance I saw last night was Jamison Olave.  He made Suazo his prison bitch and it was pretty funny.  Suazo didn’t do anything as long as Olave was marking him and Suazo is the best striker in CONCACAF.  I hope that RSL has something left in the tank still for Portland Saturday.  Jeld-Wen is a great park and a great atmosphere.  No wonder Portland is a different team at home than they are on the road.  Not to mention that a guy with a chainsaw behind the goal may just be a bit intimidating.

Anyway, enough said on the match, on to the other big news yesterday, the birth certificate.  What pisses me off is that it seems that the idiot fringe of the GOP has now taken over the base of the party.  The whole birther conspiracy just bothers me on so many different levels.  First is the whole idea of giant conspiracies just bothers me to no end.  If two people know something, it’s not secret.  The very magnitude of deception and cover-up required to even assume that Obama did not have a birth certificate pretty much guaranteed that he’s not lying.  In order to get any number of identifying document, for instance, his driver’s license, marriage license, passport, bar license, among other things, he would have to prove place of birth and citizenship.  The number of people involved and the level of deception required place the whole issue beyond the realm of possibility.  But then, the birther movement, combined with the accompanying belief that not only was he born in Kenya, but that he himself is Muslim, was always less about finding truth and fraud as it was about nothing more than simple, old-fashioned racism.  Nothing else suitably describes the lack of reasoning behind the whole movement.  To illustrate some of the idiocy, remember how many who have said Obama is a Muslim who also criticized his pastor, Jeremiah Wright?  If he’s going to a Christian church for years, with a pastor you don’t approve of because he’s a radical Black Pather type, then how is Obama a Muslim?  It’s like 1+1=3 to these people.

What really bothers me is how now the birthers are congratulating themselves, like Donald Trump did yesterday, and then setting out to move the goalposts.  Now the target will be Obama’s college transcripts.  Many of the birther leaders likened Obama’s release of his birth certificate to Nixon’s selective release of the Watergate tapes.  Sorry, but no.  These are hardly even on the same level.  Obama is not trying to cover for criminal activity, like Nixon was.  But not like I expect anything less from these people.

What really bothered me about the whole birther movement is how little mainstream Republican leaders said or did to discredit the movement and actually call a spade a spade.  Instead of condemning it in the strongest terms and calling these idiots racists that they do not welcome into their party, they gave only lukewarm, “I take the president at his word,” responses.  Why not just come out and say, unequivocally, that there is no credence to this whole movement.  Both the Democrats and Republicans continue to do this with the rightly marginalized “9/11 Truther” movement who believe that the terrorist attacks were faked by the government as a pretext to start wars in the Middle East.  No major candidate from either party has ever endorsed this movement and every mainstream voice has consistently condemned this as sheer lunacy.  Too bad we can’t say the same for the birther movement.

While I have no doubt that Obama was born in Hawaii like he said, that is not to say that I support all his policies, especially the policies that are continued from the Bush administration.  The recent Wikileaks revelations from Guantanamo show more of this.  All I am going to say about that is this: If Americans truly believe that our country is a shining beacon of liberty to the rest of the world, we better hold our government accountable and require them to behave in such a way as to actually be worthy of that title.  Holding innocents prisoner, interrogating them, even torturing them, without trials, violating half of the rights guaranteed in the Bill of Rights. I understand some of the issues, sure, but even then, classify them as criminals, then they have those constitutional rights (even noncitizens have those rights before our courts) or classify them as enemy combatants, and give them the rights guaranteed by the Geneva Conventions.  Our very credibility is on the line here.  How can you reasonably expect other countries to honor their treaty obligations from the Geneva Conventions if we ourselves don’t?

I think that Obama is many things but my biggest issue with him is that he won’t start up for things he believes are important.  He’s a pleaser and will cave to any opposition.  Sure compromise is important, but compromise means that both sides get a deal they both may not like but can both live with.  Not always will you be able to come to an agreement.  In business I have to work with customers all the time, and many times I end up having to make a deal that makes me less money than I really want, but if there is someone wanting a deal that costs me money, i just have to walk away.  Sometimes he needs to walk away from a bad deal instead of being so intent on making a deal that he concedes way too much.  Health care was a prime example of this.  Sure you got a deal, but the most important part of the health care bill, the public option, was gutted.  It would also help if he understood what Teddy Roosevelt understood about the Presidency.  It’s the bully pulpit.  He won’t address critics, he runs from them.  When Sarah Palin came out with “death panels” what did Obama respond with?  Silence.  So instead of shooting down bad information and addressing some people’s legitimate concerns, he said nothing, so  Wasilla, Alaska’s village idiot drove the debate.  The bully pulpit of the presidency means that the president will generally get the benefit of the doubt in debate and it does guarantee that people will at least listen to you.  Obama doesn’t see to understand this.  This country’s problems can’t be solved by simply inviting people over to the White House for a discussion over beers.

Ok, I am going to share a bit about my journey out of Mormonism, prompted by a comment yesterday from Shematwater.

I have always been interested in History and growing up Mormon, history is a big part of church teachings.  As I got on my mission, I faced many questions that revolved around the Church’s history.  I began intensive study of the history of the church, especially regarding the practice of polygamy as most of the questions I faced revolved around the practice.  Having training as a historian, I learned one of the most important jobs of a historian, to evaluate your sources.  Being a missionary and being limited to sources available to missionaries, I found my research questions seemed to generate more questions and not arrive at any answers.

Growing up in Utah, doing genealogy, you quickly learn how prevalent the practice of polygamy was.  Most of the official church sources, however, try to downplay how important polygamy was to Mormon religious practice, putting forth figures as low as 3% according to some Mormon-published sources.  Most other sources (both Mormon and non-Mormon) put the figure at around 33% that entered into the practice (and according to Lowell Bennion from the University of Utah, some settlements like St. George had as many as half the population enter into the practice).  Even those who themselves didn’t enter into polygamist marriages were connected to the practice, most through family connections to someone who was.  This was one of the first indications to me that what the Church said about its history was not what really happened.

As I returned home, I continued my education in History.  As I learned of incidents like the Mountain Meadows Massacre, it quickly became evident that the Church was hardly forthcoming in dealing with their history.  At this time, I was also exposed to the work of B. H. Roberts.  Roberts is interesting because he was a General Authority, so he had no axe to grind with Mormonism, unlike sources like John C. Bennett.  Roberts basically concluded in his work about the Book of Mormon that more or less, Joseph Smith plagiarized large portions of the Book of Mormon text.  Reading Robert’s conclusion, I was struck when he said that the truth of the Church stood or fell on the claim of Joseph Smith that the Book of Mormon was a history of people of ancient America that he received on gold plates.

I have always been interested in Mesoamerican civilization, particularly the Maya.  Many, if not most Mormons, believe that the civilizations of Mesoamerica were the same civilizations as those described in the Book of Mormon.  First, according to the Book of Mormon, the Nephite/Lamanite group arrived in the New World.  Looking at the civilization described in the Book of Mormon and comparing that to any civilization in the New World proves that Joseph Smith either made it all up, based on others’ work, or that some way, some how, God managed to hide all traces of an ancient civilization numbering in the millions.  Now, I am not going to go through all the traits of a civilization as described in the Book of Mormon that do not exist, but I will describe some of the most glaring.  First, the absence of iron metallurgy.  Mormon apologists have argued that iron deteriorate and that’s why no Nephite swords have been found.  First, according to the Book of Mormon, the Nephite civilization was roughly analogous to the Romans (600 BC to 400 AD).  Roman iron implements still exist.  We have Roman swords, armor, coins, nails, etc.  Even then, it is still plausible that these iron implements could be gone.  What archaeologists really look for in dealing with iron metallurgy is evidence of first iron mining.  Mine tailings don’t erode.  Evidence of mining for iron ore will exist for thousands of years.  Also, the in the smelting process, the byproducts, or slag are left behind.  Slag does not erode.  Based on the chemical composition of the slag, archaeologists can tell the components of the metal that was smelted.  The only evidence of pre-Columbian iron metallurgy in the New World exists at L’Anse aux Meadows in Newfoundland, a site conclusively liked to Vikings. So either God hid all evidence of iron metallurgy in the New World, or it never existed.  If it never existed then either God somehow caused Joseph Smith to mistranslate the Book of Mormon or it never existed and Joseph Smith made it all up.  What’s the simplest explanation?

Looking at the Book of Mormon, the culture described has little resemblance to anything in Mesoamerica at the time described.  Especially with the decryption of the Mayan written language, we now understand much more about Mayan civilization.  Little, if anything, fits the descriptions of the Book of Mormon.  It’s just not there and never was.

So by B.H. Roberts’ own admission the Church stands and falls on Joseph Smith’s translation.  I will not even get into the story of the Book of Abraham, but again, more proof that Joseph Smith made it up as he went along.  These things, after much study, pray, and pain was at the root of why I no longer believe in Mormonism.  I just could not ignore these glaring errors that formed the basis of faith.  I could not perform the mental gymnastics required to keep smiling while I knew it was all bullshit.

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/lifestyle/51631455-80/lds-says-marriage-mormon.html.csp?page=2

It’s articles like this that make me wish more Mormons would open their eyes.  Maybe they really need to look at what their leaders are saying objectively and collectively say no.  Unfortunately, most Mormons wills just unfailingly follow what these old relics from the 1950s say and rush off to get married.  It’s not important to find your soulmate?  I’m sorry, but yes, yes it is.  I don’t want to spend time with someone I am not compatible with.  Especially if I’m going to have children with that person.  Like it or not, if you have children with someone, you will have a life-long connection to that person.  If you don’t have someone you can at least get along with, you are condemned to a lifetime of misery.  Even if you get divorced.  You will still have parental duties and those will overlap with your partner.  Just getting married to get married is just a recipe for unhappiness.

In my process of leaving Mormonism, I came to realize that Mormon leadership views men only in terms of being free labor and ATM machines.  A Mormon man is only as good as his wallet.  Without a formal clergy, Mormon leaders tend to be chosen from those who are the most successful monetarily.  Growing up, the bishops of the wards, the stake presidents, and especially mission presidents were always those who had money.  For women, it’s even worse.  Women in Mormonism are only as good as the output of their uterus.  Mormonism hold people hostage to the belief system by tying everyone’s salvation in the hereafter to the salvation of their families.  This makes it really hard for those who question to leave, as the entire family structure is then threatened.

I can see why Mormon leadership is becoming even more adamant that young Mormons get married.  As the Soviets well knew, family members left in make really good hostages.  The wallets are not going to defect as long as the uteruses are still at home and still stuck in.

I hate the stench from the wrong side of the Rockies.  There are many, many reasons, but they still managed to add one more last night in their match against the Sounders.  I won’t post the video, it makes me want to puke, but Brian Mullan ended Steve Zakuani’s season, and possibly career, with his horrific tackle.  I don’t buy all the spin coming out about Mullan not really trying to hurt him and that he’s really a good guy.  Watch the play, Mullan the thug signals to the referee to call what he considered a foul seconds before he decided to take his frustration out on Zakuani.  I will buy he didn’t intend to break Zakauni’s leg, but he did intend to hurt him (hurt not injure) over something that was really a minor possible foul that the referee was correct in not calling.  I have the biggest issue with the retaliation part of the foul.  This is how people get hurt, how season and career ending injuries happen.

I have never been a fan of Mullan.  Houston, when he was there, were a bunch of thugs who instead of playing good defense would constantly play thug ball and foul every chance they got in the hopes that referees would let them get away with enough to win.  In MLS, given the quality of officiating, that’s not a bad game plan.  It sucks to watch as a fan, the game gets really choppy and just isn’t entertaining football.  Don’t get me wrong, I don’t have a problem with physical play.  I actually prefer it, but that does not mean I like dirty play.  Jamison Olave is very physical, but the majority of his challenges are fair.

What’s funny is I made the comment to my wife as the game kicked that since PaBLOW was in, Seattle better watch out, someone was going to get hurt.  That guy has just a bad influence on things.  Some people just have an aura about them and he is one.  Some players, like Javier Morales and Kyle Beckerman make those around them better, some make someone who’s normally a good guy turn into a thug.  (since I have to explain this is hyperbole, the next is not intended to be literal) So in essence, it’s really Pablo Mastroeni’s fault.

And a huge get well soon to Steve Zakuani.  Seattle fans, now you understand what RSL fans have been saying for years.

I am now reviving this:  Ceterum censeo cRapids esse delendam

http://www.realsaltlake.com/news/2011/04/monterrey-confident-ccl-glory-rio-tinto

Just read that.  this just shows why I hate Mexican football so much.  A few years ago, I went to a US-Mexico match in Phoenix.  This was during the streak where not only did the US dominate Mexico, Mexico hadn’t scored on the US in like 10 years.  Despite this, Mexican fans, and Mexican media viewed the US as a joke, like all the sudden, Mexico could just stop playing around and they would come out and show the Americans how to really play football instead of just play around.  While I don’t speak Spanish, 2 years of Latin gives me enough vocabulary to understand the gist of most conversations.  America doesn’t have any talent.  They can’t play a possession-oriented game.  They aren’t a football country, they don’t know how to play.  I heard all this and other things in the stands.  At the end of the night, 2-0 for the US and a continuation of the streak.  Mexican football is delusional about their greatness.  Sure they’ve dominated CONCACAF through history, but that domination on the national team level is over.  Their club teams have dominated as well, but I think they all know that MLS will eventually dwarf their own league, they just don’t want to admit it.  While MLS has yet to get the big breakthrough, even if RSL doesn’t get it this year, it’s on the horizon.  They can either play like the Titanic and ignore the iceberg in their path, or they can take it seriously and avoid becoming a second-rate regional power.  I can’t wait to pick this up in 10 or 20 years and see what happens.

That said, While it may not be 85 degrees at kick next week, it will be 4500 feet in altitude.  I hope Monterrey does not take this seriously, I want to see the reaction in the Mexican media if they lose.  I would not discount RSL, things will be different in Sandy.

Lots of thoughts to share, but first, wow, what a result!  First, RSL looks good in the first half.  They came out, fought hard and probably expended too much energy in the first half.  I like it and it was fun to watch.  The first Monterrey goal, Wingert made a bit of a bad play, got sucked inside and got out of position, but really, credit due to the Monterrey player who kept the ball alive and put it in a position where De Negris could put it away.  Not really a lucky bounce, but it seemed a bit like it.  Then the slap in the face, Monterrey’s manager, Víctor Manuel Vucetich, pulled 2 players in the 20th minute.  This move, at least to me, seemed to be a signal that Monterrey thought a 1-0 lead was secure against a team they probably believed should never have been to the final in the first place.  I believe one really was an injured player, but not both.  Either way, Johnson’s service on Borcher’s goal was spot on the money.  Johnson the last couple of weeks has been playing great, nothing short of spectacular.  Borchers did what Borchers does, comes up big in big games.  Olave and Russell also were huge on the night.  Olave and Borchers are the best center back duo in North America, period.  Nick Rimando had a great game too, but it’s nice that he doesn’t have to keep RSL in games on his own now.  I think credit to the team’s defense goes to not just Jason Kreis but also Robin Frasier.  When Robin came in as an assistant, the defense started to look organized.

Second half, I think the heat and high tempo of the first half got to RSL.  It is extremely difficult to experience such a drastic change in climate, going from cold and snow in Utah to high heat in Mexico.  The PK was legitimate, and probably karma for the free kick that went off Johnson’s elbow earlier in the match.  I do not understand the yellow to Beckerman or the lack of red to Zavala.  Grabbing another player’s neck is inexcusable.  Credit to Robbie Russell for defending Saborio in that exchange, there was more than just the initial push, someone also grabbed Sabo by the jersey and attempted to pick him up from the ground.  As for the Beckerman foul, on a 50-50 ball, going in with your laces should not get you a yellow.  I would totally understand if he came in with his studs up, but not with laces.  He will be missed next week, but I think that last year Ned Grabavoy demonstrated that he’s capable of filling in for Beckerman.

What can you say about Javier Morales?  That goal was the biggest goal in RSL and possibly MLS history.  Total clutch play.  And have to hand it to Alvarez.  I know there was a lot of talk about how he was a prima donna with only one move when he came here, mostly from San Jose fans.  I don’t see it.  He seems to have totally bought into the team is the star philosophy and has done nothing but contribute while wearing the claret and cobalt.  Great pickup for RSL.  My unsung man of the match though, Fabian Espindola.  This season especially, Fabian has been the workhorse.  He is always working to either score himself or make it so someone else can score.  He has truly blossomed this year.  In the past, he would lose his temper and was a red card waiting to happen, this year no.  He plays great, plays hard, plays smart.  He plays great defense.  The renaissance of Fabian Espindola has been as stellar as the renaissance of Andy Williams.  A few years ago, Andy was done, stick a fork in him.  Andy, as it went, was never in shape at the start of the season, never played defense, and was well on his way out of the league, being dumped like garbage on an expansion team like RSL in 2005.  Now, he’s one of RSL’s best players, still creative, but also a great defender, capable of doing 90 minutes better at age 33 than at 28.

I don’t know if I can handle waiting a week for the return at Riot Tinto.  This time, wearing the victory claret instead of draw jaundice kits.  Yes, that is the new name for the ugly yellow kits, draw jaundice.

Ok, I will start out by saying that RSL is playing the best football this early in a season I’ve ever seen an MLS team play.  They find weaknesses and exploit them mercilessly.  The match against the stench from the wrong side of the Rockies was textbook RSL.  Wear them down, keep beating on them, and score when it matters.  I have not seen many teams as dangerous on free kicks as RSL.  If you commit a foul, or let the ball out for a corner, RSL will punish you.

In other news, I had a great time at the Western Social Science Association conference this year, in SLC.  My paper about the debates between Tomas Masaryk and Joseph Pekar about the meaning of Czech history went well.  I also met a guy from Japan who does similar work on Czechoslovak nation-building, but focusing on the Sokol organization.  The discussion was great and now I have some ideas and leads in applying to Phd programs.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.